Liberals are always touting how they want to see women succeed and are all for them having equal rights, but it's only for liberal women. Remember how they went after katherine Harris in Florida that time during the Bush/Gore recount fiasco. They made fun of her on Saturday Night Live. Look how they went after Sarah Palin making fun of her clothes, making fun of her kids and they way she talked. Tina Fey mocked her on Satnight Live and the media made her look like a complete dunce even though she was rated as the No. 1 governor in the U.S. by the National Governor's Association.. Michelle Malkin is another terrific conservative writer and a beautiful woman, but she has been forced to move twice from her homes because of death threats by liberal opponents.
The other night I was in my local Border's bookstore and I noticed a book mocking Sarah Palin's book called "Going Roughe- An American Nightmare." It was designed to look like her book with her same pic on the cover only instead of a bright background like on her book they had a dark night time background. It said the authors were two writers from "The Nation." It figures.That's a lib publication ,but who would know. So when you get right down to it, liberals are the biggest, sexist people around.They cover up their misogeney by pretending to be all for strong women when actually it is they who are are the true sexists.
Below are some interestng articles from the Grreat American Journal. The red comments are mine. :)
Despite President Obama's long history of criticizing the Bush administration for "sweetheart deals" with favored contractors, the Obama administration this month awarded a $25 million federal contract for work in Afghanistan to a company owned by a Democratic campaign contributor without entertaining competitive bids, Fox News has learned.
The contract, awarded on Jan. 4 to Checchi & Company Consulting, Inc., a Washington-based firm owned by economist and Democratic donor Vincent V. Checchi, will pay the firm $24,673,427 to provide "rule of law stabilization services" in war-torn Afghanistan. . (And they criticized Bush for Haliburton event hough Clinton used Haliburton also)
State of Disunion (Or is it the State of Illusion?)By Mark AlexanderOn Wednesday, 27 January, Barack Hussein Obama1 will deliver his first "State of the Union" speech as president, a self evaluation of his first year's achievements. Sprinkled between his infamous "let me be clear" or "make no mistake" introduction to his prevarications, he will, characteristically, attempt to spin a plethora of failures into something good using these phony fallback phrases: back from the brink; signs of recovery; restored our reputation; achieved some successes; more work yet to do; fiscal restraint; greed on Wall Street; affordable health care; relief for working families; job creation and, of course, investing in America, a euphemism for taxing and spending. (People are waking up to the fact they made a mistake voting for this fake ,fraud and phoney. Let's hope they don't fall back under his spell.)
Obama Uses Teleprompter for 1st Grade Audience Just two pictures and comments here that tell a story of alarming incompetence - when a president of the United States has to use a teleprompter to speak to 1st grade school students. This is not complicated. This is not rocket science being talked about here. This is a mindless empty suit who needs someone else to put words into his mouth simply to talk to 5 year olds. Unbelievable!!! ( I think he sleeps with his teleprompter.:D) Now the media is saying it was in a different room to reorters he used the tele-rompter. That's still shows incompetance if you ask me. Some detractors alleged he needed a teleprompter to talk to kids, but that's not what the photos really show. Why bloggers got the story wrong I still think he sleeps with the teleprompter :D
J.D. Hayworth will be running for John McCain's Senate seat, while Sarah Palin will be destroying her popularity with conservatives by stumping for McCain. Big mistake on Palin's part that will cost her a lot of conservative support. If Palin were a true conservative she would support Hayworth, and not engage in political payback to McCain. That is enough to disqualify her from my Conservative Candidate list should she choose to run for office.
I understand Palin feeling the need to pay back McCain for what he did for her political career (although it was really his advisors, including radio talk hosts, that did it). It has to be a tough decision to make. But by choosing to campaign for him, she is essentially destroying any advances she may have gained as his running mate. She is putting politics ahead of principle and I cannot condone that. That is precisely what is wrong in Congress today. If she goes through with it, I, for one, will never be able to trust her again and will not support her for anything. The last thing we need is John McCain for another 6 years when we could have J.D. Hayworth instead. (I agree with the author here and like him I can understand her position too. It is a tough decision.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment